Comparison

Glace noix vs Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch

Overall, Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGlace noixBio-Eis Walnuss Crunch
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 215 kcal 162 kcal
Fat 11.5 g 9.8 g
Saturated fat 4.5 g 4.1 g
Sugars 21.6 g 13 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.7 g —
Protein 5.3 g 3.2 g
Additives40
AllergensEggs, Milk, NutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch has 25% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 215 kcal).
  • Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch has 15% less fat (9.8 g vs 11.5 g).
  • Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch has 40% less sugar (13 g vs 21.6 g).
  • Glace noix has 40% more protein (5.3 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Glace noix lists: Eggs, Milk, Nuts.

Ingredients

Glace noix

_Lait_ écrémé réhydraté, sucre, morceaux de _noix_ torréfiées 6%, jaune d'_oeuf_, sirop de sucre inverti, pâte de _noix_ pure 2,7%, _beurre_ doux, huile de noix de coco, arôme naturel de _noix_ avec autres arômes naturels, émulsifiant : mono et diglycérides d'acides gras (issus d'huiles végétales), stabilisants : farine de graines de caroube, alginate de sodium, farine de graines de guar, carraghénanes (extrait d'algues), alcool de _noix_ 0,2% (jus de _noix_ vertes vieilli 5 ans en fût de chêne, alcool agricole).

Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Glace noix or Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch?

Overall, Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio-Eis Walnuss Crunch has less sugar: 13 g versus 21.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons