Giant Caramel & Sea Salt Choc Buttons vs Smash! Sjokoladeplate
Overall, Smash! Sjokoladeplate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Giant Caramel & Sea Salt Cho... | Smash! Sjokoladeplate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 553 kcal | 540 kcal |
| Fat | 78 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 7.5 g | 47 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 8.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smash! Sjokoladeplate has 59% less fat (32 g vs 78 g).
- Smash! Sjokoladeplate has 10% less saturated fat (18 g vs 20 g).
- Giant Caramel & Sea Salt Choc Buttons has 84% less sugar (7.5 g vs 47 g).
- Giant Caramel & Sea Salt Choc Buttons has 82% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Smash! Sjokoladeplate has 93% more protein (8.6 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Giant Caramel & Sea Salt Choc Buttons
Zucker, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Inulin, getrockneter Reissirup, Reisstärke, Reismehl, Sheaöl, Aroma, Meersalz, Emulgator (Sonnenblumenlecithine). Kakao: 50%
Smash! Sjokoladeplate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Giant Caramel & Sea Salt Choc Buttons or Smash! Sjokoladeplate?
Overall, Smash! Sjokoladeplate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smash! Sjokoladeplate has fewer calories: 540 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Giant Caramel & Sea Salt Choc Buttons has less sugar: 7.5 g versus 47 g per 100 g.