Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel vs Gâteau de Riz sur Lit de Caramel
Overall, Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel
Gâteau de Riz sur Lit de Caramel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gâteau de riz sur lit de car... | Gâteau de Riz sur Lit de Car... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 124 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 16.9 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 5 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel has 24% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.1 g).
- Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel has 33% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel has 16% more protein (3.2 g vs 2.7 g).
Ingredients
Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel
Lait entier (62 %), sucre, riz (10 %), œufs frais (7 %), caramel (4,8 %)(eau, sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, amidon modifié (maïs), épaississants : pectine, gomme xanthane), arôme, colorants : rocou, curcumine ; sel.
Gâteau de Riz sur Lit de Caramel
Lait entier (43%), eau, riz (12%), sucre, caramel (sucre, eau), oeufs (5,1%), amidon de maïs, arôme, épaississants : gomme xanthane, pectines.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel or Gâteau de Riz sur Lit de Caramel?
Overall, Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gâteau de riz sur lit de caramel has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gâteau de Riz sur Lit de Caramel has less sugar: 16 g versus 16.9 g per 100 g.