Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g vs Selleriesalat
Overall, Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g
Selleriesalat
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garniture de céleri-branche... | Selleriesalat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 9 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Celery | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g has 67% fewer calories (9 kcal vs 27 kcal).
- Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g has 96% less sugar (0.2 g vs 4.8 g).
- Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g has 43% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Selleriesalat has 69% more fiber (4.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Selleriesalat has the better Nutri-Score.
- Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g
Tiges de CÉLERIS coupées, eau, sel. Ces céleris sont cultivés en France.
Selleriesalat
_Sellerie_, Zucker, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Äpfelsäure; Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Aromen.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g or Selleriesalat?
Overall, Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g has fewer calories: 9 kcal versus 27 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garniture de céleri-branche d'aucy 250g has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.