Comparison
Garnelen vs Warm Gerookte Zalm
Overall, Warm Gerookte Zalm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garnelen | Warm Gerookte Zalm |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 147 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 8.2 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garnelen has 32% fewer calories (147 kcal vs 216 kcal).
- Garnelen has 41% less fat (8.2 g vs 14 g).
- Warm Gerookte Zalm has 77% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 9 g).
- Warm Gerookte Zalm has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Warm Gerookte Zalm has 27% more protein (22 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Garnelen
Not available.
Warm Gerookte Zalm
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garnelen or Warm Gerookte Zalm?
Overall, Warm Gerookte Zalm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garnelen has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Warm Gerookte Zalm has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.