Comparison

Galantine pour porc vs Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes

Overall, Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGalantine pour porcGalantine de chevreuil aux c...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 249 kcal 220 kcal
Fat 21 g 17 g
Saturated fat 8 g 6 g
Sugars 1.4 g 2.1 g
Salt 2 g 2.4 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 13 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has 12% fewer calories (220 kcal vs 249 kcal).
  • Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has 19% less fat (17 g vs 21 g).
  • Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has 25% less saturated fat (6 g vs 8 g).
  • Galantine pour porc has 33% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Galantine pour porc has 17% less salt (2 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Galantine pour porc has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
  • Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Galantine pour porc

Not available.

Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Galantine pour porc or Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes?

Overall, Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has fewer calories: 220 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Galantine pour porc has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons