Galantine pour porc vs Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes
Overall, Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Galantine pour porc | Galantine de chevreuil aux c... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 220 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has 12% fewer calories (220 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has 19% less fat (17 g vs 21 g).
- Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has 25% less saturated fat (6 g vs 8 g).
- Galantine pour porc has 33% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Galantine pour porc has 17% less salt (2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Galantine pour porc has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
- Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Galantine pour porc
Not available.
Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Galantine pour porc or Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes?
Overall, Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galantine de chevreuil aux cèpes has fewer calories: 220 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Galantine pour porc has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.