Galantine pour porc vs Galantine charcutière de volaille
Overall, Galantine pour porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Galantine pour porc | Galantine charcutière de vol... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 7.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galantine pour porc has 30% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Galantine pour porc has 20% less salt (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Galantine pour porc has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
Ingredients
Galantine pour porc
Not available.
Galantine charcutière de volaille
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Galantine pour porc or Galantine charcutière de volaille?
Overall, Galantine pour porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galantine pour porc has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Galantine pour porc has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2 g per 100 g.