Comparison
Fussball-Bockwurst vs Stracke Luftgetrocknete Mettwurst
Overall, Fussball-Bockwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fussball-Bockwurst | Stracke Luftgetrocknete Mett... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 365 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.6 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 12 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fussball-Bockwurst has 27% fewer calories (268 kcal vs 365 kcal).
- Fussball-Bockwurst has 14% less fat (24 g vs 28 g).
- Fussball-Bockwurst has 20% less saturated fat (9.6 g vs 12 g).
- Stracke Luftgetrocknete Mettwurst has 64% less salt (4.3 g vs 12 g).
- Stracke Luftgetrocknete Mettwurst has 98% more protein (27 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Fussball-Bockwurst
Not available.
Stracke Luftgetrocknete Mettwurst
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fussball-Bockwurst or Stracke Luftgetrocknete Mettwurst?
Overall, Fussball-Bockwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fussball-Bockwurst has fewer calories: 268 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fussball-Bockwurst has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Stracke Luftgetrocknete... vs Geflügel Bockwürstchen
Fussball-Bockwurst vs Geflügel Bockwürstchen
Stracke Luftgetrocknete... vs Bio Wiener
Fussball-Bockwurst vs Bio Wiener
Stracke Luftgetrocknete... vs Geflügel Bratwurst
Putenbrust vs Fussball-Bockwurst
Fussball-Bockwurst vs Geflügel Bratwurst
Delikates Geflügel-Wiene... vs Stracke Luftgetrocknete...