Comparison
Fulgi de soia eco vs Sojaflocken
Overall, Fulgi de soia eco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fulgi de soia eco | Sojaflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 425 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 5.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 19 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 41 g | 41 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fulgi de soia eco has 44% less sugar (3 g vs 5.4 g).
- Fulgi de soia eco has 47% more fiber (19 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Fulgi de soia eco
Bio Sojaflocken 100%.
Sojaflocken
Sojaflocken
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fulgi de soia eco or Sojaflocken?
Overall, Fulgi de soia eco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fulgi de soia eco has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 425 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fulgi de soia eco has less sugar: 3 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.