Comparison

Fuet Catalan vs Fuet catalan fines herbes

Overall, Fuet Catalan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFuet CatalanFuet catalan fines herbes
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 435 kcal 476 kcal
Fat 34.9 g 37 g
Saturated fat 14.4 g 15 g
Sugars 0.9 g 2.2 g
Salt 4 g 3.6 g
Fiber 1 g —
Protein 29.1 g 28 g
Additives28
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fuet Catalan has 59% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Only Fuet catalan fines herbes lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Fuet Catalan

Viande de porc (Origine Espagne), sel, dextrose, poivre noir, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium conservateurs : nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium colorant: carmins ferment, fleurs de surface. Boyau naturel de porc. 176 g de viande de porc mis en oeuvre pour l'élaboration de 100 g de fuet.

Fuet catalan fines herbes

FUET CATALAN FINES HERBES Fuet extra Espagnol avec une couverture de fines herbes. INGREDiENTS• Viande et gras de porc, sel, Lactose, LAIT ÉCRÉMÉ EN POUDRE. epices. conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, Nitrate de potassium et acetate de sodium, arome naturel de levure,antioxydant, erythorbate de sodium, dextrose, ferments Produit de couverture • persil 6%, origan 2%, agent d'enrobage E472 et E410, conservateur• E 235 et caseinate de calcium. Boyau naturel de porc comestible. 154g de viande de porc mis en oeuvre pour 100g de produit fini.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fuet Catalan or Fuet catalan fines herbes?

Overall, Fuet Catalan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fuet Catalan has fewer calories: 435 kcal versus 476 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fuet Catalan has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons