Fudge vs Marc de champagne
Overall, Fudge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fudge | Marc de champagne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 396 kcal | 488 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 73 g | 50 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fudge has 19% fewer calories (396 kcal vs 488 kcal).
- Fudge has 62% less fat (9.8 g vs 26 g).
- Fudge has 59% less saturated fat (6.5 g vs 16 g).
- Marc de champagne has 32% less sugar (50 g vs 73 g).
- Marc de champagne has 66% more protein (4.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Only Marc de champagne lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Fudge
sucre, sirop de glucose, _LAIT_ condensé sucré & écrémé, huile de palme, whiskey 0.2%, arôme, sel
Marc de champagne
Захар, инвертен захарен сироп, какаово масло, какаова масло, пьлномаслено мляко на прах, Марк Де Шампейн (7%), обезмаслено мляко на прах, дехидратирана млечна мазнина, лактоза, вода, емулгатор (cоев лецитин), ечемичен малцов екстракт, естествен ароматизант, aроматизанти.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fudge or Marc de champagne?
Overall, Fudge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fudge has fewer calories: 396 kcal versus 488 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Marc de champagne has less sugar: 50 g versus 73 g per 100 g.