Frulos vs Petits Filou - Tub's, goût fraise, framboise et pêche
Overall, Frulos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frulos | Petits Filou - Tub's, goût f... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 75 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 12.1 g | 10.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frulos has 17% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 91 kcal).
- Frulos has 67% less fat (0.9 g vs 2.7 g).
- Frulos has 67% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Petits Filou - Tub's, goût fraise, framboise et pêche has 11% less sugar (10.8 g vs 12.1 g).
- Petits Filou - Tub's, goût fraise, framboise et pêche has 11% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.4 g).
- Frulos has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Frulos
Yaourt (Lait écrémé à base de poudre de lait - Lait écrémé , Crème, Poudre de lait écrémé, Ferments lactiques (lait), Sucre 8.9%, Aromes naturels, Concentré des minéraux du lait - Vitamine D
Petits Filou - Tub's, goût fraise, framboise et pêche
skim milk, sugar 7,1%, cream, skim milk powder, lactic ferments (milk), vitamin d, calcium citrate, natural flavors, processed cassava starch and corn, thickener: guar gum, acidity regulator: citric acidic acid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frulos or Petits Filou - Tub's, goût fraise, framboise et pêche?
Overall, Frulos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frulos has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petits Filou - Tub's, goût fraise, framboise et pêche has less sugar: 10.8 g versus 12.1 g per 100 g.