Fruitsiroop vs Smågodt Bubblizz Original
Overall, Smågodt Bubblizz Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Fruitsiroop | Smågodt Bubblizz Original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 216 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 50.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smågodt Bubblizz Original has 95% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 216 kcal).
- Smågodt Bubblizz Original has no sugar, while Fruitsiroop has 50.3 g.
- Smågodt Bubblizz Original has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fruitsiroop
Water, suiker, glucose-fructosestroop, 10% perziksap uit vruchtensapconcentraat, voedingszuur: citroenzuur; 0,5% zwarte thee-extract, natuurlijk aroma, aroma, zuurteregelaar: natriumcitraten; kleurstof: sulfiet-ammoniakkaramel; stabilisator: glycerolesters van houthars. Tegen warmte en vochtigheid beschermen. Na openen rechtop en
Smågodt Bubblizz Original
Vann, surhetsregulerende middel (sitronsyre, E331), naturlig aroma, stabilisator (E414, E444, E445), vegetabilsk olje (kokos, raps), søtstoff (sukralose, acesulfam k), fargestoff (E133), konserveringsmiddel (kaliumsorbat).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruitsiroop or Smågodt Bubblizz Original?
Overall, Smågodt Bubblizz Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smågodt Bubblizz Original has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smågodt Bubblizz Original has less sugar: 0 g versus 50.3 g per 100 g.