Comparison

Frucht-Quark Erdbeer vs Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere

Overall, Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFrucht-Quark ErdbeerBio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeer...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 114 kcal 107 kcal
Fat 4.2 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 2.8 g 2.1 g
Sugars 13 g 11.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 5 g 6.6 g
Additives30
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere has 24% less fat (3.2 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere has 25% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere has 10% less sugar (11.7 g vs 13 g).
  • Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere has 24% more protein (6.6 g vs 5 g).
  • Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Frucht-Quark Erdbeer

_Frischkäse_, _Joghurt_ mild, Zucker, Erdbeeren Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, modifizierte Stärke, Speisegelatine, Verdickungsmittel: Pektine, Guarkernmehi, Johannisbrotkernmehl; färbende Pflanzenkonzentrate (Rote Betesaft, Karotte), Aroma.

Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere

Speisequark³, 10% Heidelbeeren¹², Rahm, Zucker Joghurt mild', Zitronensaftkonzentrat', Tapiokastärke, farbe Konzentrat aus Schwarze Karotten-Saft¹, Verdickungsmittel Pektin und Johannisbrotkernmehl¹. Glutenfrei. Bei +8 °C

FAQ

Which is healthier: Frucht-Quark Erdbeer or Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere?

Overall, Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio-Fruchtquark - Heidelbeere has less sugar: 11.7 g versus 13 g per 100 g.

More comparisons