Comparison

Friand A La Viande vs Friands à la viande 2x110g

Overall, Friands à la viande 2x110g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFriand A La ViandeFriands à la viande 2x110g
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 368 kcal 340 kcal
Fat 22 g 24 g
Saturated fat 12 g 12 g
Sugars 1.6 g 1 g
Salt 2 g 1.3 g
Fiber 1.3 g 1.9 g
Protein 9.8 g 10 g
Additives21
AllergensCelery, Eggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Friands à la viande 2x110g has 38% less sugar (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Friands à la viande 2x110g has 35% less salt (1.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Friands à la viande 2x110g has 32% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Friands à la viande 2x110g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Friand A La Viande lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Friand A La Viande

Farine de blé, viande de porc (France), eau, beurre, œufs entiers, sel, vin blanc, amidon de riz, blanc d'œuf en poudre, jus de citron, marc de Bourgogne, épices, plantes aromatiques, sucre, érythorbate de sodium, nitrite de sodium, arômes naturels (céleri)

Friands à la viande 2x110g

Pâte feuilletée 58% [farine de BLÉ (France) 33%, BEURRE 16%, eau, OEUF, sel], viande de porc 34% (origine : France), OEUF, vin blanc 1,6%, eau, sel, épices, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. traces éventuelles de crustacés, poissons, mollusques et soja.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Friand A La Viande or Friands à la viande 2x110g?

Overall, Friands à la viande 2x110g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Friands à la viande 2x110g has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Friands à la viande 2x110g has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons