Comparison

Fourrés duo cacao vs Biscuits fourrage cacaoté

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFourrés duo cacaoBiscuits fourrage cacaoté
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 491 kcal 491 kcal
Fat 21 g 21 g
Saturated fat 7.2 g 6 g
Sugars 30 g 28 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.6 g
Fiber 5.2 g 4.3 g
Protein 9 g 8.4 g
Additives53
AllergensGluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Biscuits fourrage cacaoté has 17% less saturated fat (6 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Fourrés duo cacao has 17% more fiber (5.2 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Only Biscuits fourrage cacaoté lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Fourrés duo cacao

Farine de _blé_* 33%, farine complète de _blé_* 15 %, sucre de canne roux* non raffiné, sucre de canne* non raffiné, huile de tournesol* oléique, beurre de cacao*, poudre de cacao* maigre 6 %, _lait_* entier en poudre 6 %, _lait_* écrémé en poudre 1,4%, poudres à lever (carbonates d'ammonium, carbonates de sodium), épaississant : gomme d'acacia*, sel de mer non raffiné, émulsifiant : lécithines, antioxydant : extrait de romarin*, * Ingrédients biologiques

Biscuits fourrage cacaoté

Farine de blé* 50 % ; sucre de canne roux* 24%; huile de tournesol*; cacao maigre en poudre* 5,9%; poudre de lait écrémé*; beurre de cacao* 3,9%; œufs*; beurre*; sel; poudres à lever : E500, E503 ; épaississant : gomme d'acacia*; amidon de blé*. * Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fourrés duo cacao or Biscuits fourrage cacaoté?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fourrés duo cacao has fewer calories: 491 kcal versus 491 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Biscuits fourrage cacaoté has less sugar: 28 g versus 30 g per 100 g.

More comparisons