Formula 2 vs Vitamin C + Zink
Overall, Vitamin C + Zink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Formula 2 | Vitamin C + Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 92 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | — |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vitamin C + Zink has no calories, while Formula 2 has 368 kcal.
- Vitamin C + Zink has no sugar, while Formula 2 has 92 g.
Ingredients
Formula 2
Not available.
Vitamin C + Zink
Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure, Säureregulatoren Natriumhydrogencarbonat und Natriumcarbonat, L-Ascorbinsäure, Feuchthalte - mittel Sorbit, Inulin, Stärke, Trennmittel Tricalciumphosphat, Aroma, Süßungs - mittel Natriumcyclamat und Natriumsaccharin, Zinkgluconat, Maltodextrin, lactose-& glutenfrei Rote Bete Saftpulver, Farbstoff Riboflavin-5 - Phosphat
FAQ
Which is healthier: Formula 2 or Vitamin C + Zink?
Overall, Vitamin C + Zink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vitamin C + Zink has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vitamin C + Zink has less sugar: 0 g versus 92 g per 100 g.