Comparison
Fontal Mbuget vs Fontal
Overall, Fontal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fontal Mbuget | Fontal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 369 kcal | 329 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fontal has 11% fewer calories (329 kcal vs 369 kcal).
- Fontal has 14% less fat (25 g vs 29 g).
- Fontal has 12% less saturated fat (15 g vs 17 g).
- Fontal Mbuget has 52% less salt (1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Only Fontal lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fontal Mbuget
Not available.
Fontal
Lait
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fontal Mbuget or Fontal?
Overall, Fontal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fontal has fewer calories: 329 kcal versus 369 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fontal Mbuget has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.