Comparison

Focaccine alla Toscana vs Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto

Overall, Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFocaccine alla ToscanaFocaccine con quinoa e amara...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — —
Calories 255 kcal 383 kcal
Fat 4.3 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.4 g
Sugars 1.7 g 0.8 g
Salt 1.7 g 0.8 g
Protein 7.2 g 8.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Focaccine alla Toscana has 33% fewer calories (255 kcal vs 383 kcal).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 53% less fat (2 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 53% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 53% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 15% more protein (8.5 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Focaccine alla Toscana

Not available.

Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Focaccine alla Toscana or Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto?

Overall, Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Focaccine alla Toscana has fewer calories: 255 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons