Comparison

Focaccine vs Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto

Overall, Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFocaccineFocaccine con quinoa e amara...
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group — —
Calories 450 kcal 383 kcal
Fat 16 g 2 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 0.4 g
Sugars 1.8 g 0.8 g
Salt 2.8 g 0.8 g
Protein 2.8 g 8.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 15% fewer calories (383 kcal vs 450 kcal).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 88% less fat (2 g vs 16 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 78% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 56% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 71% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has 67% more protein (8.5 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Focaccine

Not available.

Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Focaccine or Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto?

Overall, Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 450 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Focaccine con quinoa e amaranto has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons