Florida vs Mangosaft
Overall, Florida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Florida | Mangosaft |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 6 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Florida has 48% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 56 kcal).
- Florida has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Florida has 49% less sugar (6.6 g vs 13 g).
- Mangosaft has 80% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Mangosaft is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Florida
Agua, zumo de frutas en proporción variable a partir de concentrado 20% (naranja y mandarina), azúcar, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, estabilizantes (E-412, E-466, E-440 y E-410), acidulante (ácido cítrico), edulcorante (sucralosa), vitamina C, colorante (B-caroteno) y aromas,
Mangosaft
Wasser, Mangomark teilweise aus Mangomarkkonzentrat, Zucker, Maracujasaft, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Vitamin C
FAQ
Which is healthier: Florida or Mangosaft?
Overall, Florida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Florida has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Florida has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 13 g per 100 g.