Fizzy Strawberry Lances vs Number One
Overall, Number One has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fizzy Strawberry Lances | Number One |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 335 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 53.7 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 5.3 g |
| Additives | 4 | 7 |
| Allergens | Apple, Gluten | Apple, Gelatin |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Number One has no fat, while Fizzy Strawberry Lances has 2 g.
- Number One has 47% more protein (5.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Only Fizzy Strawberry Lances lists: Gluten.
- Only Number One lists: Gelatin.
Ingredients
Fizzy Strawberry Lances
sugar, glucose-fructose syrup, wheat flour, acids: malic acid, citric acid, dextrose, palm oil, flavouring, fruit and vegetable concentrates (apple, pumpkin, radish, tomato), concentrated strawberry juice, concentrated blackcurrant juice, antioxidants: tocopherol-rich extract, ascorbic acid,
Number One
Sirop de glucose, sucre, gélatine, acidifiants: acide citrique, acide lactique, dextrose, arômes, aliments colorants (cassis, carotte noire, patate douce, radis, pomme, carotte), concentré de jus de citron, colorant: curcumine, caramel ammoniacal, bleu brillant FCF, huile de palme, agents d’enrobage: cire d'abeille, blanc et jaune, cire de camauba.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fizzy Strawberry Lances or Number One?
Overall, Number One has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Number One has fewer calories: 335 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fizzy Strawberry Lances has less sugar: 53.7 g versus 57 g per 100 g.