Comparison

Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips vs Pita Chips Cinnamon Sugar

Overall, Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFire Roasted Jalapeño Pita C...Pita Chips Cinnamon Sugar
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 464 kcal 500 kcal
Fat 17.9 g 17.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.8 g
Sugars 3.6 g 21.4 g
Salt 2.5 g —
Fiber 3.6 g 3.6 g
Protein 10.7 g 10.7 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips has no saturated fat, while Pita Chips Cinnamon Sugar has 1.8 g.
  • Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips has 83% less sugar (3.6 g vs 21.4 g).
  • Pita Chips Cinnamon Sugar is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips

enriched wheat flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), sunflower oil and/or canola oil, sea salt, organic cane sugar, and less than 2% of the following: dried red bell pepper, dried jalapenos, wheat gluten,

Pita Chips Cinnamon Sugar

enriched wheat flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), sunflower oil and/or canola oil, sugar, and less than 2% of the following: whole wheat flour, organic cane sugar, brown sugar, cinnamon, sea salt, yeast

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips or Pita Chips Cinnamon Sugar?

Overall, Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips has fewer calories: 464 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fire Roasted Jalapeño Pita Chips has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 21.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons