Filete de trucha vs Filetes de trucha
Overall, Filete de trucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filete de trucha | Filetes de trucha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 123 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filete de trucha has 13% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 141 kcal).
- Filete de trucha has 25% less fat (4.5 g vs 6 g).
- Filete de trucha has 43% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Filete de trucha
Not available.
Filetes de trucha
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filete de trucha or Filetes de trucha?
Overall, Filete de trucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filete de trucha has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filete de trucha has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.