Far Breton Pruneaux vs Far Breton aux Pruneaux
Overall, Far Breton Pruneaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Far Breton Pruneaux
Far Breton aux Pruneaux
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Far Breton Pruneaux | Far Breton aux Pruneaux |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 203 kcal | 284 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 12.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 21.5 g | 24.6 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Far Breton Pruneaux has 29% fewer calories (203 kcal vs 284 kcal).
- Far Breton Pruneaux has 65% less fat (4.5 g vs 12.9 g).
- Far Breton aux Pruneaux has 16% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Far Breton Pruneaux has 13% less sugar (21.5 g vs 24.6 g).
- Far Breton aux Pruneaux has 78% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Far Breton aux Pruneaux has 15% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Far Breton Pruneaux has 16% more protein (5.6 g vs 4.7 g).
Ingredients
Far Breton Pruneaux
LAIT entier, pruneaux 17% *, OEUFS entiers*, farine de froment*, sucre de canne*, sel de Guérande. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique
Far Breton aux Pruneaux
Sucre, farine de froment (_gluten_), _œufs_, _lait_, huile de tournesol, pruneaux, beurre frais de baratte (_lait_), rhum agricole.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Far Breton Pruneaux or Far Breton aux Pruneaux?
Overall, Far Breton Pruneaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Far Breton Pruneaux has fewer calories: 203 kcal versus 284 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Far Breton Pruneaux has less sugar: 21.5 g versus 24.6 g per 100 g.