Fakiat vs Fakiat
Overall, Fakiat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fakiat | Fakiat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 509 kcal | 502 kcal |
| Fat | 23.9 g | 24.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.3 g | 10.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fakiat has 53% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Fakiat has 13% more fiber (6 g vs 5.3 g).
- Fakiat has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fakiat
maïs frit, huile végétale (palme), arôme de chili, sel, exhausteur de goût (glutamate monosodique), poudre de piment, colorant (E160c)
Fakiat
maïs, huile végétale, sel, arôme de fromage, exhausteur de goût E160c, E160b
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fakiat or Fakiat?
Overall, Fakiat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fakiat has fewer calories: 502 kcal versus 509 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fakiat has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.