Esrom vs Esrom g. g. A.
Overall, Esrom g. g. A. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Esrom | Esrom g. g. A. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 9 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 23.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Käsereimilch, Milch | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Esrom has 76% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 323 kcal).
- Esrom has 99% less fat (0.3 g vs 25 g).
- Esrom has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 16 g).
- Esrom g. g. A. has 96% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.4 g).
- Esrom g. g. A. has 81% less salt (1.7 g vs 9 g).
- Esrom g. g. A. has 84% more protein (23.5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Esrom g. g. A. has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Esrom lists: Käsereimilch, Milch.
Ingredients
Esrom
Käsereimilch, Speisesalz, Käserei - kulturen (enthalten Milch), mikrobielles Lab, Rotschmierekulturen. SEIT
Esrom g. g. A.
Pasteurisierte MILCH, Speisesalz, MILCHSÄUREKULTUREN, mikrobielles Lab.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Esrom or Esrom g. g. A.?
Overall, Esrom g. g. A. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Esrom has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 323 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Esrom g. g. A. has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.