Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise vs Escalope de veau milanaise
Overall, Escalope de veau milanaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Escalope de veau attendrie e... | Escalope de veau milanaise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 116 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise has 26% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 157 kcal).
- Escalope de veau milanaise has no sugar, while Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise has 0.3 g.
- Escalope de veau milanaise has 28% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
- Escalope de veau milanaise has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise lists: Eggs, Gluten.
Ingredients
Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise
Escalope de veau (63%), chapelure (farine de blé, levures, sel, paprika) (BLE), eau, amidon (BLE), œuf entier (OEUF), blanc d'œuf (OEUF), marinade (7%) : eau, sel, acidifiants lactate de potassium, acétate de potassium, arômes naturels, E301-E300.
Escalope de veau milanaise
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise or Escalope de veau milanaise?
Overall, Escalope de veau milanaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Escalope de veau milanaise has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.