Entrecôte Viande Bovine à Griller vs Entrecôte race charolaise
Overall, Entrecôte race charolaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Entrecôte Viande Bovine à Griller
Entrecôte race charolaise
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Entrecôte Viande Bovine à Gr... | Entrecôte race charolaise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 169 kcal |
| Fat | 12.4 g | 9.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 32.1 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Entrecôte race charolaise has 30% fewer calories (169 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Entrecôte race charolaise has 25% less fat (9.3 g vs 12.4 g).
- Entrecôte race charolaise has 14% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 5.7 g).
- Entrecôte Viande Bovine à Griller has no sugar, while Entrecôte race charolaise has 0.4 g.
- Entrecôte Viande Bovine à Griller has 38% more protein (32.1 g vs 20 g).
Ingredients
Entrecôte Viande Bovine à Griller
Viande bovine 100 %.
Entrecôte race charolaise
Entrecôte de viande bovine de raca charolaise label rouge
FAQ
Which is healthier: Entrecôte Viande Bovine à Griller or Entrecôte race charolaise?
Overall, Entrecôte race charolaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Entrecôte race charolaise has fewer calories: 169 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Entrecôte Viande Bovine à Griller has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.