Comparison
Entrecote vs 1 Entrecôte
Overall, Entrecote has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Entrecote | 1 Entrecôte |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 162 kcal | 206 kcal |
| Fat | 8.7 g | 14.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 19.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Entrecote has 21% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 206 kcal).
- Entrecote has 39% less fat (8.7 g vs 14.2 g).
- Entrecote has 30% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 5.6 g).
- 1 Entrecôte has no sugar, while Entrecote has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Entrecote
Not available.
1 Entrecôte
Viande bovine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Entrecote or 1 Entrecôte?
Overall, Entrecote has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Entrecote has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
1 Entrecôte has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.