Ekologisk småbladsmix vs Ekologisk småbladsmix
Overall, Ekologisk småbladsmix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ekologisk småbladsmix | Ekologisk småbladsmix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekologisk småbladsmix has 24% more fiber (2 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Ekologisk småbladsmix
Ruccola* 30%, röd babybatavia* 25%, grön babybatavia* 25%, babyspenat* 20%. *Ekologisk
Ekologisk småbladsmix
Rucola* 30%, röd babybatavia* 25%, grön babybatavia* 25%, babyspenat* 20%. *Ekologisk
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ekologisk småbladsmix or Ekologisk småbladsmix?
Overall, Ekologisk småbladsmix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekologisk småbladsmix has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekologisk småbladsmix has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.