Ekologisk Havredryck Barista vs Bevanda Avena Barista
Overall, Ekologisk Havredryck Barista has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ekologisk Havredryck Barista | Bevanda Avena Barista |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 58 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekologisk Havredryck Barista has 29% less fat (2 g vs 2.8 g).
- Ekologisk Havredryck Barista has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ekologisk Havredryck Barista has 42% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Ekologisk Havredryck Barista has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ekologisk Havredryck Barista
Not available.
Bevanda Avena Barista
Acqua, AVENA 14%, olio di semi di girasole, correttore di acidità: fosfato dipotassico; sale, addensante: gomma di gellano.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ekologisk Havredryck Barista or Bevanda Avena Barista?
Overall, Ekologisk Havredryck Barista has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekologisk Havredryck Barista has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekologisk Havredryck Barista has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.