Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas vs Blütenhonig
Overall, Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas
Blütenhonig
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edulcorante de mesa a base d... | Blütenhonig |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 318 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 79 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has no calories, while Blütenhonig has 318 kcal.
- Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has no sugar, while Blütenhonig has 79 g.
- Blütenhonig has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas
ivóvíz, édesítőszerek: ciklamát, szacharinok; étkezési sav: citromsav; tartósítószer: kálium-szorbát
Blütenhonig
Honig
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas or Blütenhonig?
Overall, Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has less sugar: 0 g versus 79 g per 100 g.