Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas vs Bio Landhonig
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edulcorante de mesa a base d... | Bio Landhonig |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 2 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 302 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 75.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has no calories, while Bio Landhonig has 302 kcal.
- Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has no sugar, while Bio Landhonig has 75.1 g.
- Bio Landhonig has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Bio Landhonig is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas
ivóvíz, édesítőszerek: ciklamát, szacharinok; étkezési sav: citromsav; tartósítószer: kálium-szorbát
Bio Landhonig
Honig
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas or Bio Landhonig?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 302 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edulcorante de mesa a base de ciclamatos y sacarinas has less sugar: 0 g versus 75.1 g per 100 g.