Comparison
Easy Rider Bulldog vs 0.3% Ipa
Overall, 0.3% Ipa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Easy Rider Bulldog | 0.3% Ipa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 23 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 0.3% Ipa has 35% less sugar (2.6 g vs 4 g).
- 0.3% Ipa has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- 0.3% Ipa is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Easy Rider Bulldog
Barley and wheat malt,YEAST, HOPS.
0.3% Ipa
Wasser, GERSTENMALZ, WEIZEN, Hopfen, Hefe, Mango, Orangenschale, Kardamom.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Easy Rider Bulldog or 0.3% Ipa?
Overall, 0.3% Ipa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Easy Rider Bulldog has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 23 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
0.3% Ipa has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 4 g per 100 g.