Bezalkoholowe IPA vs Easy Rider Bulldog
Overall, Bezalkoholowe IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bezalkoholowe IPA | Easy Rider Bulldog |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 23 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bezalkoholowe IPA has no fat, while Easy Rider Bulldog has 0.5 g.
- Bezalkoholowe IPA has 45% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4 g).
- Bezalkoholowe IPA has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Bezalkoholowe IPA is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bezalkoholowe IPA
woda, słód jęczmień pilzneński, pszenica, słód żytni, chmiel: Citra, Amarillo, Chinook, Lubelski, Cascade, herbata Sencha Earl Grey, drożdże.
Easy Rider Bulldog
Barley and wheat malt,YEAST, HOPS.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bezalkoholowe IPA or Easy Rider Bulldog?
Overall, Bezalkoholowe IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Easy Rider Bulldog has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 23 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bezalkoholowe IPA has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4 g per 100 g.