Comparison

Earl grey vs Alice Ceylon Tea

Overall, Earl grey has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEarl greyAlice Ceylon Tea
Nutri-Score — b
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 1 kcal 30 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 1.1 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Earl grey has 97% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 30 kcal).
  • Alice Ceylon Tea has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Earl grey is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Earl grey

95% zwarte thee, natuurlijk bergamot - en citroenaroma met andere natuurlijke aroma's.

Alice Ceylon Tea

Reis, Melasse, Kräuter

FAQ

Which is healthier: Earl grey or Alice Ceylon Tea?

Overall, Earl grey has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Earl grey has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alice Ceylon Tea has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons