Earl Grey vs Alice Ceylon Tea
Overall, Alice Ceylon Tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Earl Grey | Alice Ceylon Tea |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 30 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Earl Grey has 96% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 30 kcal).
- Alice Ceylon Tea has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
- Alice Ceylon Tea is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Earl Grey
Crni čaj, aroma bergamota
Alice Ceylon Tea
Reis, Melasse, Kräuter
FAQ
Which is healthier: Earl Grey or Alice Ceylon Tea?
Overall, Alice Ceylon Tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Earl Grey has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Earl Grey has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.