Dulano, Würstel affumicati vs Grobe Bratwurst
Overall, Grobe Bratwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dulano, Würstel affumicati | Grobe Bratwurst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 278 kcal | 239 kcal |
| Fat | 24.5 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 12.3 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Grobe Bratwurst has 14% fewer calories (239 kcal vs 278 kcal).
- Grobe Bratwurst has 27% less fat (18 g vs 24.5 g).
- Grobe Bratwurst has 36% less saturated fat (7 g vs 11 g).
- Grobe Bratwurst has 70% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Grobe Bratwurst has 17% less salt (1.6 g vs 1.9 g).
- Grobe Bratwurst has 32% more protein (18 g vs 12.3 g).
- Grobe Bratwurst has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Dulano, Würstel affumicati
Es: 82% carne de cerdo, agua, sal nitritada (sal, conservador: nitrito sódico), especias, dextrosa, vinagre de alcohol, extractos de especias, estabilizante: difosfatos; antioxidante: ácido ascórbico; tripa natural (cerdo), humo de madera de haya.
Grobe Bratwurst
98% Schweinefleisch, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Gewürze, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Gewürzextrakte, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Zitronensaftpulver, Naturdarm (Schwein)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dulano, Würstel affumicati or Grobe Bratwurst?
Overall, Grobe Bratwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Grobe Bratwurst has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 278 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grobe Bratwurst has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1 g per 100 g.