Dry salami vs Cacciatore
Overall, Dry salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dry salami | Cacciatore |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 404 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.9 g | 11.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 4.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dry salami has 12% fewer calories (357 kcal vs 404 kcal).
- Dry salami has 26% less fat (25 g vs 34 g).
- Dry salami has 22% less saturated fat (8.9 g vs 11.4 g).
- Dry salami has no sugar, while Cacciatore has 0.5 g.
- Dry salami has 21% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Dry salami has 16% more protein (28.6 g vs 24 g).
- Only Dry salami lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Dry salami
Pork, salt, dextrose, wine, natural flavorings, sodium ascorbate, sodium nitrate, sodium nitrite, lactic acid starter culture.
Cacciatore
Свинско месо, трапезна сол, декстроза, пипер, чесън, антиоксидант: натриев аскорбат, консерванти: натриев нитрит, калиев нитрат,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dry salami or Cacciatore?
Overall, Dry salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dry salami has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 404 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dry salami has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.