Drinking Chocolate vs Belgian Choc Orange Sachrt 11g
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Drinking Chocolate | Belgian Choc Orange Sachrt 1... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 566 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 24.9 g | 44 g |
| Salt | — | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 9.4 g | — |
| Protein | 10.3 g | 8.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 7 |
| Allergens | Milk, Orange, Soybeans | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Belgian Choc Orange Sachrt 11g has 38% fewer calories (348 kcal vs 566 kcal).
- Belgian Choc Orange Sachrt 11g has 84% less fat (7 g vs 44 g).
- Drinking Chocolate has 44% less sugar (24.9 g vs 44 g).
- Drinking Chocolate has 15% more protein (10.3 g vs 8.7 g).
- Only Drinking Chocolate lists: Orange, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Drinking Chocolate
Cocoa solids (cocoa mass, cocoa butter), sugar, full cream MILK powder, essential oils (blood orange, orange), emulsifier (SOYA lecithin).
Belgian Choc Orange Sachrt 11g
MILK permeate powder, fat-reduced cocoa g powder 20%, thickeners (gum arabic, xanthan gum), Belgian KJ Chocolate 6% (sugar, cocoa mass, fat-reduced cocoa powder', cal flavouring), dried glucose syrup, coconut oil, salt, skimmed MILK g powder, emulsifiers (E322, E472e), sweetener (aspartame g anti-caking agent (E551), stabiliser (E340(ii)), natural orange flavouring.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Drinking Chocolate or Belgian Choc Orange Sachrt 11g?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Belgian Choc Orange Sachrt 11g has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 566 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Drinking Chocolate has less sugar: 24.9 g versus 44 g per 100 g.