Comparison

Diots de Savoie vs Diots de Savoie fumés - 4x90g

Overall, Diots de Savoie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDiots de SavoieDiots de Savoie fumés - 4x90...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 238 kcal 344 kcal
Fat 18 g 30 g
Saturated fat 7.4 g 12 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.7 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.5 g
Protein 17 g 17 g
Additives11
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Diots de Savoie has 31% fewer calories (238 kcal vs 344 kcal).
  • Diots de Savoie has 40% less fat (18 g vs 30 g).
  • Diots de Savoie has 38% less saturated fat (7.4 g vs 12 g).
  • Diots de Savoie has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Diots de Savoie

Viande de porc, eau, vin blanc, oignon pasteurisé, sel, _lactose_, ail réhydraté, poivre, muscade, gingembre, cannelle, fenugrec, girofle, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments lactiques (contient _lait_), enveloppe : boyau naturel de porc. 101 g de viande de porc mis en œuvre pour 100g de produit fini. Viande de porc origine France. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque.

Diots de Savoie fumés - 4x90g

Viande de porc (origine : France), eau, vin blanc, sel, LACTOSE, ail, poivre, muscade, épices (gingembre, cannelle, fenugrec, girofle), conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments. Boyau naturel de porc. Fumé au bois de hêtre. 103g de viande de porc utilisée pour 100g de produit fini.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Diots de Savoie or Diots de Savoie fumés - 4x90g?

Overall, Diots de Savoie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Diots de Savoie has fewer calories: 238 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Diots de Savoie has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons