Dinkel Canestrelli vs Canestrelli al riso
Overall, Dinkel Canestrelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dinkel Canestrelli | Canestrelli al riso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 483 kcal | 461 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 22 g | 20 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Canestrelli al riso has 33% less fat (16 g vs 24 g).
- Dinkel Canestrelli has 76% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Dinkel Canestrelli has 59% more fiber (2.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Dinkel Canestrelli has 47% more protein (7.5 g vs 4 g).
- Dinkel Canestrelli is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Dinkel Canestrelli lists: Nuts.
- Only Canestrelli al riso lists: None.
Ingredients
Dinkel Canestrelli
Dinkelmehl** Type 630 (53%), Rübenzucker**, Sonnenblumenöl**, Mandeln** (5%), Zitronenöl*, Orangenöl*, Meersalz, Backtriebmittel: Natriumcarbonate. Kann Spuren von anderen Nüssen und Sesam enthalten.
Canestrelli al riso
miscela (farina di riso 54%, amido di mais, farina di lino, farina di pisello, agenti lievitanti (bicarbonato di ammonio, bicarbonato di sodio), sale, antiossidante (tocoferolo)), zucchero, olio di semi di girasole, farina di riso 10%, aromi, emulsionante (lecitina di girasole).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dinkel Canestrelli or Canestrelli al riso?
Overall, Dinkel Canestrelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Canestrelli al riso has fewer calories: 461 kcal versus 483 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Canestrelli al riso has less sugar: 20 g versus 22 g per 100 g.