Dinkel Canestrelli vs Biscotti di pasta frolla
Overall, Dinkel Canestrelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dinkel Canestrelli | Biscotti di pasta frolla |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 483 kcal | 506 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 22 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dinkel Canestrelli has 85% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 12 g).
- Dinkel Canestrelli has 41% more fiber (2.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Dinkel Canestrelli has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Dinkel Canestrelli lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Dinkel Canestrelli
Dinkelmehl** Type 630 (53%), Rübenzucker**, Sonnenblumenöl**, Mandeln** (5%), Zitronenöl*, Orangenöl*, Meersalz, Backtriebmittel: Natriumcarbonate. Kann Spuren von anderen Nüssen und Sesam enthalten.
Biscotti di pasta frolla
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dinkel Canestrelli or Biscotti di pasta frolla?
Overall, Dinkel Canestrelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dinkel Canestrelli has fewer calories: 483 kcal versus 506 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Biscotti di pasta frolla has less sugar: 21 g versus 22 g per 100 g.