Deluxe Chocoladeletter Melj vs Chocoladeletters melk
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Deluxe Chocoladeletter Melj | Chocoladeletters melk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 531 kcal | 558 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 35.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 21.1 g |
| Sugars | 59 g | 52.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Deluxe Chocoladeletter Melj has 15% less fat (30 g vs 35.1 g).
- Deluxe Chocoladeletter Melj has 15% less saturated fat (18 g vs 21.1 g).
- Chocoladeletters melk has 11% less sugar (52.5 g vs 59 g).
- Chocoladeletters melk has 54% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Deluxe Chocoladeletter Melj lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Deluxe Chocoladeletter Melj
Suiker, cacaoboter, volle melkpoeder, cacaomassa, karamel zeezout balletjes (5%) [suiker, cacaoboter, volle melkpoeder, rijstebloem, tarwemeel, magere melkpoeder, zout, cacaomassa, tarwevezel, gerstemout, emulgator (E322 (soja)), kleurstof (E160c), natuurlijk vanille aroma], weipoeder (melk), lactose (melk), magere melkpoeder, emulgator (E322 (soja)), aroma, natuurlijk vanille aroma.
Chocoladeletters melk
Suiker, cacaoboter, volle melkpoeder, cacaomassa, weipoeder (_melk_), melkvet, emulgator (sojalecithinen).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Deluxe Chocoladeletter Melj or Chocoladeletters melk?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Deluxe Chocoladeletter Melj has fewer calories: 531 kcal versus 558 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocoladeletters melk has less sugar: 52.5 g versus 59 g per 100 g.