Comparison
Defender IPA vs Non Ipa
Overall, Defender IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Defender IPA | Non Ipa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 24 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Non Ipa has 48% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Defender IPA has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Defender IPA has 97% less sugar (0.1 g vs 3.8 g).
- Only Defender IPA lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Defender IPA
Eau, _Malt d'Orge_, Houblons et Extrait de Houblon.
Non Ipa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Defender IPA or Non Ipa?
Overall, Defender IPA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Non Ipa has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Defender IPA has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.