Comparison

Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels vs Bites

Overall, Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDark Chocolate Sea Salt Cara...Bites
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 500 kcal 500 kcal
Fat 23.3 g 28.6 g
Saturated fat 16.7 g 17.9 g
Sugars 53.3 g 50 g
Salt 1.3 g 0.3 g
Fiber 6.7 g 3.6 g
Protein 6.7 g 3.6 g
Additives22
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels has 18% less fat (23.3 g vs 28.6 g).
  • Bites has 78% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels has 46% more fiber (6.7 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels has 46% more protein (6.7 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Only Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels

DARK CHOCOLATE (UNSWEETENED CHOCOLATE, SUGAR, COCOA BUTTER, SOY LECITHIN [EMULSIFIER], NATURAL VANILLA FLAVOR), STICKY TOFFEE CARAMEL (SUGAR, GLUCOSE SYRUP [WHEAT], COCONUT OIL, WATER,, CONDENSED MILK [SKIM MILK, SUGAR, LACTOSE], MILK CHOCOLATE [SUGAR,, COCOA BUTTER, UNSWEETENED CHOCOLATE, WHOLE MILK POWDER, WHEY POWDER, SOY LECITHIN (EMULSIFIER}],, BUTTER [CREAM, SALT], SEA SALT), SEA SALT, NATURAL FLAVOR.

Bites

oatmilk chocolate, butter, oat paste, lecithin (emulsifier), coconut cream, brown rice syrup, organic vanilla

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels or Bites?

Overall, Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Caramels has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bites has less sugar: 50 g versus 53.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons