Comparison

Dark Chocolate Ginger vs Chocolat noir Gingembre confit

Overall, Dark Chocolate Ginger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDark Chocolate GingerChocolat noir Gingembre conf...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 483 kcal 551 kcal
Fat 23.9 g 36 g
Saturated fat 12.6 g 22 g
Sugars 33.4 g 37 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber — 7.9 g
Protein 4.5 g 7.6 g
Additives62
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dark Chocolate Ginger has 12% fewer calories (483 kcal vs 551 kcal).
  • Dark Chocolate Ginger has 34% less fat (23.9 g vs 36 g).
  • Dark Chocolate Ginger has 43% less saturated fat (12.6 g vs 22 g).
  • Chocolat noir Gingembre confit has 41% more protein (7.6 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Only Dark Chocolate Ginger lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Dark Chocolate Ginger

Plain Chocolate (40%) (Sugar, Cocoa Mass, Cocoa Butter, Milk Fat, Emulsifier: Soya Lecithin, Vanilla Flavouring), Wheat Flour (Calcium, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Sugar, Vegetable Oil (Palm, Rapeseed), Golden Syrup, Butter, Ground Ginger (1.5%), Raising Agents (Ammonium Bicarbonate, Sodium Bicarbonate). Salt.

Chocolat noir Gingembre confit

pâte de cacao du Pérou et d'Haïti 50%, sucre de canne, gingembre confit 8% (gingembre, sucre), beurre de cacao, poudre de gingembre 0,8%, émulsifiant lécithine de _soja_ (non OGM),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Ginger or Chocolat noir Gingembre confit?

Overall, Dark Chocolate Ginger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dark Chocolate Ginger has fewer calories: 483 kcal versus 551 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dark Chocolate Ginger has less sugar: 33.4 g versus 37 g per 100 g.

More comparisons