Comparison

Danao frz limon hh vs Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos

Overall, Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDanao frz limon hhFruta + leche tropical sin a...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 358 kcal 18 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 71 g 3.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0.2 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.4 g
Additives34
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has 95% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 358 kcal).
  • Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has 95% less sugar (3.8 g vs 71 g).
  • Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Danao frz limon hh

Eau, lait écrémé, sucre, concentré de jus de fruit, arôme, stabilisant gomme de cellulose, régulateur d'acidité acide citrique, arôme identique naturel, gomme de guar, colorant rouge carmin, MG OUC

Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos

Agua, zumo de frutas a partir de concentrado 16% (uva, piña (4,5%), mango (2%) y manzana), leche desnatada en polvo rehidratada (15%), estabilizante (pectina), correctores de la acidez (ácido citrico y citratos de sodio), edulcorante (sucralosa), vitaminas C, E, A y B caroteno y aromas. "

FAQ

Which is healthier: Danao frz limon hh or Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos?

Overall, Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 71 g per 100 g.

More comparisons