Comparison

Danao Pêche Abricot vs Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos

Overall, Danao Pêche Abricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDanao Pêche AbricotFruta + leche tropical sin a...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 40 kcal 18 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 8.2 g 3.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0.2 g
Protein 0.8 g 0.4 g
Additives34
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has 55% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 40 kcal).
  • Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has 54% less sugar (3.8 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Danao Pêche Abricot has 50% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Danao Pêche Abricot has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Danao Pêche Abricot

Jus de fruits à base de concentrés 68,8% (pomme 54,3%, pêche 7,5%, abricot 7%), lait écrémé 16%, eau, stabilisant: pectine de fruit, aromes naturels, acidifiant: acide citrique, vitamine E, colorant: carotènes.

Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos

Agua, zumo de frutas a partir de concentrado 16% (uva, piña (4,5%), mango (2%) y manzana), leche desnatada en polvo rehidratada (15%), estabilizante (pectina), correctores de la acidez (ácido citrico y citratos de sodio), edulcorante (sucralosa), vitaminas C, E, A y B caroteno y aromas. "

FAQ

Which is healthier: Danao Pêche Abricot or Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos?

Overall, Danao Pêche Abricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fruta + leche tropical sin azúcares añadidos has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 8.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons